This is the Grade 8 Mathematics Quarter 3 Module 6 self-learning module (SLM), Proving Two Triangles are Congruent, developed by DepEd Caraga Region (First Edition, 2021). It is written for Grade 8 learners studying at home or in class, and for the teachers and parents who guide them. After this module, learners can name the conditions that make two triangles congruent and write two-column proofs using the triangle congruence postulates and theorems.
What learners will learn
The module has one lesson, Lesson 1: Proving Two Triangles Are Congruent. After going through it, learners are expected to:
- identify conditions for triangle congruence;
- use triangle congruence postulates and theorems to prove that two triangles are congruent;
- use two-column proof in proving that two triangles are congruent; and
- recognize real-life applications of congruent triangles.
The congruence postulates and theorems
The module starts from the definition of congruence: two triangles are congruent if their vertices can be made to coincide so that all corresponding sides and all corresponding angles are congruent. Instead of checking all six pairs of parts, the postulates and theorems below need only three.
| Name | What must be congruent | Applies to |
|---|---|---|
| SAS (Side-Angle-Side) Postulate | Two sides and the included angle | Any triangles |
| ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) Postulate | Two angles and the included side | Any triangles |
| SSS (Side-Side-Side) Postulate | All three sides | Any triangles |
| AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) Theorem | Two angles and a non-included side | Any triangles |
| HyA (Hypotenuse-Acute angle) Theorem | The hypotenuse and an acute angle | Right triangles only |
| HyL (Hypotenuse-Leg) Theorem | The hypotenuse and a leg | Right triangles only |
| LA (Leg-Acute angle) Theorem | A leg and an acute angle | Right triangles only |
| LL (Leg-Leg) Theorem | Both legs | Right triangles only |
The module explains how these connect: AAS is deduced from the ASA Postulate, LA and HyA can be proved using AAS, and LL and HyL can be proved using SSS (with the Pythagorean Theorem finding the third side).
It also warns that three congruent angles (AAA) are not enough. Triangles with the same angles can have the same shape but different sizes, as the module shows with triangles formed by the diagonals of a tower.
Steps in writing a congruence proof
The module teaches a three-step method used in every example:
- Identify what is given and what is to be proved, and mark the given information on the diagram.
- Identify the congruence postulate or theorem to use, plus any extra information needed and why.
- Write the statements and reasons in a two-column proof, making sure the last statement is what you needed to prove.
Common reasons that appear in the proofs include Given, Reflexive Property (a shared side is congruent to itself), Vertical Angle Theorem, Right Angle Theorem (all right angles are congruent), Definition of Midpoint, and the Angle Sum Theorem (the angles of a triangle add up to 180°).
Worked examples in the module
- Example 1: Two triangles meeting at R are proved congruent by SAS, using the vertical angles at R.
- Example 2: A shared diagonal (Reflexive Property) completes an SSS proof.
- Example 3: ΔDOG ≅ ΔCAT is proved two ways, by AAS and by ASA after using the Angle Sum Theorem.
- Examples 4 to 7: Right triangle proofs using AAS, SSS with the Pythagorean Theorem, HyL, LA, and LL.
- Example 8: The triangles in an umbrella frame, modeled as a parallelogram RAIN cut by a diagonal, are proved congruent by SSS, SAS, and ASA.
- Example 9: Triangles in a tower’s frame show why AAA does not prove congruence.
Activities and assessments
- What I Know (pretest): 15 multiple-choice items, including completing a short proof.
- What’s In, Match Me!: Match figures to SAS, ASA, or SSS.
- What’s New: List corresponding congruent parts of given triangle pairs.
- What’s More: Activity 1, Give Me! (name the postulate or give missing parts), Activity 2, Fill Me Up (complete a proof), and Activity 3, My Home (prove congruence in a roof truss).
- What I Have Learned: A fill-in-the-blanks summary of the postulates and theorems.
- What I Can Do: Complete a proof using the triangles in the Buntun Bridge over the Cagayan River.
- Assessment (post-test): 15 items.
- Additional Activities: Explain and illustrate how wires of equal length staked around a hut form congruent angles, scored with a 10-point rubric.
How to use this module
Learners: Take the pretest first to check what you already know, then work through the parts in order. Write all answers on a separate sheet of paper and do not mark the module. Answer keys for the activities and tests are at the back; use them honestly, only after answering. Finish with the post-test to check your learning.
Parents: Help your child follow the order of the parts and keep the answer key closed until the work is done. If your child is stuck on a proof, the worked examples show each step.
Teachers: The pretest and post-test help measure progress, and the Additional Activities task comes with a ready rubric. Learners who have trouble are reminded in the module to consult their teacher or facilitator.
Frequently asked questions
What grade and quarter is this module for?
It is the Grade 8 Mathematics module for Quarter 3, Module 6, titled Proving Two Triangles are Congruent.
Does the module have an answer key?
Yes. Answer keys for the pretest, activities, What I Have Learned, What I Can Do, and the post-test are at the back of the module. The Additional Activities answers vary.
Which congruence theorems apply only to right triangles?
HyA (Hypotenuse-Acute angle), HyL (Hypotenuse-Leg), LA (Leg-Acute angle), and LL (Leg-Leg) apply only to right triangles.
Can three congruent angles prove that two triangles are congruent?
No. The module shows that AAA only means the triangles have the same shape; they can still have different sizes, so their sides may not be congruent.
What is a two-column proof?
It is a proof written in a table with statements on the left and the reason for each statement on the right, ending with the statement you set out to prove.
Full text of the module
The text below is a transcription of the PDF above, as printed.
Mathematics Quarter 3 – Module 6 Proving Two Triangles are Congruent
Mathematics – Grade 8 Alternative Delivery Mode Quarter 3 – Module 6: Proving Two Triangles are Congruent First Edition, 2021
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names, trademarks, etc.) included in this book are owned by their respective copyright holders. Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from their respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim ownership over them.
Published by the Department of Education Secretary: Leonor Magtolis Briones Undersecretary: Diosdado M. San Antonio
| Development Team of the Module | |
|---|---|
| Authors: | : Michelle R. Alipao, Fe Gagarin A. Lilangan |
| Editor: | : Joel B. Asonto |
| Reviewers | : Ruel C. Alaan. Vicente P. Balbuena |
| Illustrators | : Mercedita N. Pangilinan, Rachelle T. Tranquilo |
| Layout Artists | : Jeru Salem O. Cuarteron, Ivin Mae N. Ambos, Darven G. Cinchez |
| Management Team | : Francis Cesar B. Bringas Isidro M. Biol, Jr. Maripaz F. Magno Josephine Chonie M. Obseñares Josita B. Carmen Celsa A. Casa Regina Euann A. Puerto Bryan L. Arreo Elnie Anthony P. Barcenas Leopardo P. Cortes, Jr. Claire Ann P. Gonzaga |
Printed in the Philippines by ________________________
Department of Education – Caraga Region
Office Address: Learning Resource Management Section (LRMS), J.P. Rosales Avenue, Butuan City, Philippines 8600 Telefax Nos.: (085) 342-8207 / (085) 342-5969 E-mail Address: caraga@deped.gov.ph
8
Mathematics
Quarter 3 – Module 6 Proving Two Triangles are Congruent
Introductory Message
This Self-Learning Module (SLM) is prepared so that you, our dear learners, can continue your studies and learn while at home. Activities, questions, directions, exercises, and discussions are carefully stated for you to understand each lesson.
Each SLM is composed of different parts. Each part shall guide you step-by-step as you discover and understand the lesson prepared for you.
Pre-tests are provided to measure your prior knowledge on lessons in each SLM. This will tell you if you need to proceed on completing this module or if you need to ask your facilitator or your teacher’s assistance for better understanding of the lesson. At the end of each module, you need to answer the post-test to self-check your learning. Answer keys are provided for each activity and test. We trust that you will be honest in using these.
In addition to the material in the main text, Notes to the Teacher are also provided to our facilitators and parents for strategies and reminders on how they can best help you on your home-based learning.
Please use this module with care. Do not put unnecessary marks on any part of this SLM. Use a separate sheet of paper in answering the exercises and tests. And read the instructions carefully before performing each task.
If you have any questions in using this SLM or any difficulty in answering the tasks in this module, do not hesitate to consult your teacher or facilitator.
Thank you.
What I Need to Know
This module is designed for you to understand what it means for two triangles to be congruent and the ways to prove that these triangles are congruent using the theorems and postulates on triangle congruence. This will help you also learn how to prove some theorems of triangle congruence including the right triangles. You will be guided on how to make statements step-by-step and how to make reasons in each corresponding statement. The scope of this module enables you to use it in many different learning situations. The lessons are arranged to follow the standard sequence of the course. But the order in which you read them can be changed to correspond with the textbook you are now using.
This module contains:
Lesson 1: Proving Two Triangles Are Congruent
After going through this module, you are expected to:
- identify conditions for triangle congruence;
- use triangle congruence postulates and theorems to prove that two triangles are congruent;
- use two-column proof in proving that two triangles are congruent; and
- recognize real-life applications of congruent triangles.
What I Know
Pre- Assessment:
Directions: Choose the letter of the correct answer. Write your answer on a separate sheet of paper.
- “If two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and an included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent”. Which postulate proves this statement?
- A. AAS Congruence
- B. ASA Congruence
- C. SAS Congruence
- D. SSS Congruence
- Which statement is NOT sufficient to prove the congruence of two triangles?
- A. Three angles of one triangle are congruent respectively to three angles of another triangle.
- B. Three sides of one triangle are congruent respectively to the three sides of another triangle.
- C. Two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent respectively to the two angles and the included side of another triangle.
- D. Two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent respectively to the two angles and the non-included side of another triangle.
For item numbers 3, 4 and 5 refer to the figure at the right.
[illustration: triangle figure with labels O, C, V, I, D; segment CI crosses segment DO at V]
- $\overline{CI}$ bisects $\overline{DO}$ at V. Which of the following is TRUE?
- A. $\overline{OV} \cong \overline{VI}$
- B. $\overline{CV} \cong \overline{VD}$
- C. $\overline{OV} \cong \overline{VD}$
- D. $\angle COV \cong \angle VID$
- $\overline{OD}$ and $\overline{CI}$ bisect each other. Which set of congruence statements is correct?
- A. $\overline{VI} \cong \overline{VD}$, $\overline{CV} \cong \overline{OV}$
- B. $\overline{DV} \cong \overline{OV}$, $\overline{CV} \cong \overline{IV}$
- C. $\overline{VC} \cong \overline{VO}$, $\overline{VD} \cong \overline{VI}$
- D. $\overline{VO} \cong \overline{VI}$, $\overline{VC} \cong \overline{VD}$
- If $\overline{OD}$ and $\overline{CI}$ bisect each other, which set of congruence statements is correct?
- A. $\angle CVO \cong \angle IVD$, $\overline{OV} \cong \overline{VI}$, $\overline{CV} \cong \overline{VD}$
- B. $\angle CVO \cong \angle IVD$, $\overline{OV} \cong \overline{VD}$, $\overline{CV} \cong \overline{VI}$
- C. $\angle CVO \cong \angle IVD$, $\angle VCO \cong \angle VID$, $\overline{CV} \cong \overline{VD}$
- D. $\angle CVO \cong \angle IVD$, $\angle VOC \cong \angle VDI$, $\overline{OV} \cong \overline{VI}$
- Refer to the figure at the right, $\overline{OV} \perp \overline{DE}$ at V. Which set of congruence statements can be used to prove that $\Delta DVO \cong \Delta EVO$ by HyA Congruence Theorem?
- A. $\overline{OE} \cong \overline{OD}$, $\overline{DV} \cong \overline{EV}$
- B. $\overline{OE} \cong \overline{OD}$, $\overline{OV} \cong \overline{OV}$
- C. $\overline{OD} \cong \overline{OE}$, $\angle ODV \cong \angle OEV$
- D. $\overline{OD} \cong \overline{OE}$, $\angle DVO \cong \angle EVO$
For item numbers 7 and 8, consider the figures at the right.
[illustration: two triangles ABC and DEF with labels A, B, C, D, E, F; sides 6 cm and 6 cm, angles 30°, 110°, 30°, 110°]
- Which one states the congruence of the two triangles?
- A. $\Delta ABC \cong \Delta EFD$
- B. $\Delta ABC \cong \Delta EDF$
- C. $\Delta ABC \cong \Delta FED$
- D. $\Delta ABC \cong \Delta FDE$
- Which theorem or postulate can prove the congruence of the two triangles?
- A. AAS Congruence
- B. ASA Congruence
- C. SAS Congruence
- D. SSS Congruence
- It is given that $\Delta CAN \cong \Delta FED$. Which of the following statement/s is/are true?
i. $\angle CAN \cong \angle FED$ ii. $\angle ANC \cong \angle EDF$ iii. $\overline{CA} \cong \overline{FE}$
- A. i and ii
- B. i and iii
- C. ii and iii
- D. i, ii, and iii
- The figure at the right shows that $\Delta ABC \cong \Delta FED$. Which theorem or postulate supports this statement?
[illustration: two triangles ABC and FED with labels A, B, C, D, E, F; sides 15 cm and 15 cm, angles 30°, 110°, 30°, 110°]
- A. AAS Congruence
- B. ASA Congruence
- C. SAS Congruence
- D. SSS Congruence
For item numbers 11 and 12, use the figure below.
[illustration: triangle with vertices A (top), K (bottom), S (left) and segment SI drawn from S to point I on side AK]
- Which of the following statements is NOT correct if $I$ is the midpoint of $\overline{AK}$ and $\overline{SI} \perp \overline{AK}$ at $I$?
- A. $\angle SAK$ and $\angle SKA$ are right angles
- B. $\angle SIA$ and $\angle SIK$ are right angles
- C. $\overline{SI} \cong \overline{SI}$
- D. $\overline{AI} \cong \overline{KI}$
- Given: $\overline{SI}$ bisects $\angle ASK$, $\overline{SI} \perp \overline{AK}$ at $I$, which of the following statements about triangle congruence is true?
- A. $\Delta ISA \cong \Delta ISK$ by ASA Congruence
- B. $\Delta ISA \cong \Delta IKS$ by SAS Congruence
- C. $\Delta SIA \cong \Delta SKI$ by ASA Congruence
- D. $\Delta SIA \cong \Delta SKI$ by SAS Congruence
- Triangles $MAN$ and $SEW$ are right triangles. If $\overline{AN} \cong \overline{ES}$ and $\overline{NM} \cong \overline{SW}$, what special right triangle theorem will prove that $\Delta MAN \cong \Delta WES$?
[illustration: two right triangles MAN and SEW with right-angle marks; labels M, A, N, W, E, S]
- A. HyA Congruence Theorem
- B. HyL Congruence Theorem
- C. LA Congruence Theorem
- D. LL Congruence Theorem
Congruent triangles are commonly seen in buildings and other structures such as bridges, towers and the like. The figure below is a bridge showing congruent triangles.
[photo: truss bridge with two triangles outlined in red]
For items 14 and 15, refer to the image at the right. Complete the proof below by choosing the letter of the correct answer.
- A. ASA Congruence Postulate
- B. SAS Congruence Postulate
- C. SSS Congruence Postulate
- D. $\overline{RA} \cong \overline{TA}$
- E. $\overline{SA} \cong \overline{SA}$
- F. $\overline{ST} \cong \overline{ST}$
Given: $\overline{SR} \cong \overline{ST}$ $\overline{SA}$ bisects $\angle RST$
Prove: $\Delta SRA \cong \Delta STA$
Proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. $\overline{SR} \cong \overline{ST}$ | 1. Given |
| 2. $\overline{SA}$ bisects $\angle RST$ | 2. Given |
| 3. $\angle RSA \cong \angle TSA$ | 3. Definition of Angle Bisector |
| 4. (14) | 4. Reflexive Property |
| 5. $\Delta SRA \cong \Delta STA$ | 5. (15) |
Lesson 1 Proving Two Triangles are Congruent
A new tree park site will be built in your school in which it will contain three triangular gardens. The design for the tree park is shown on the graphing paper.
Does garden DRY and WET have the same sizes and shapes? Are they congruent?
If yes, how can we prove that the two triangles are congruent?
How can we apply triangle congruence theorem to prove that the two triangles are congruent?
Let us first review the previous topic by answering the activity in the next page.
Enjoy!
[illustration: graphing paper showing the tree park design with labels Y, D, W, R, E, O, H, T, I, E, T as printed]
What’s In
Activity: Match Me!
Directions: Math each figure in Column A with the corresponding triangle congruence postulate in column B. Choose the letter of the correct answer. Use a separate sheet of paper.
| Column A | Column B |
|---|---|
| _____ 1. [illustration: two triangles with tick marks forming a V shape] | A. Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) |
| _____ 2. [illustration: isosceles triangle with a perpendicular segment from the apex and tick marks] | B. Side-Angle-Side (SAS) |
| _____ 3. [illustration: two triangles with angle arcs and side tick marks] | C. Side-Side-Side (SSS) |
| _____ 4 [illustration: parallelogram divided by a diagonal, with tick marks] | |
| _____ 5. [illustration: two triangles meeting at a point, with tick marks] |
Questions:
- How did you find the activity? Do you find it difficult to identify what congruence postulate is illustrated in each figure?
- What is your basis in determining which congruence postulate is illustrated in each given figure?
What’s New
Directions: List down the corresponding congruent parts of each pair of congruent triangles and answer the questions that follow.
| Congruent Triangles | Corresponding Congruent parts |
|---|---|
| 1. [illustration: triangles AWR and DSR sharing point R, with labels A, W, R, D, S and tick marks] | |
| 2. [illustration: parallelogram CARE with diagonal CR, with labels C, A, E, R and tick marks] |
Questions:
a. Were you able to list down the corresponding congruent parts of each pair of congruent triangles? If yes, what is your basis in identifying the congruent parts? b. Are the corresponding congruent parts enough to prove that the two triangles are congruent? c. What congruence postulate can be used to prove the congruence of each pair of triangles?
What is It
In the previous lesson, you learned that triangles are congruent if they have exactly the same shape and size. Specifically, two triangles are congruent if and only if their vertices can be made to coincide so that corresponding sides are congruent and corresponding angles are congruent. However, in certain cases, if the three pairs of corresponding parts are congruent, then it is sufficient to prove that two triangles are congruent.
Let us now recall the conditions under which two triangles are congruent.
- SAS (Side-Angle-Side) Congruence Postulate
If two sides and an included angle of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
- ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) Congruence Postulate
If two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and an included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
- SSS (Side-Side-Side) Congruence Postulate
If three sides of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
From these congruence postulates mentioned above, other theorems can be deduced.
Suppose you are given the measures of two angles and a non-included side, are these information sufficient to prove the congruence of the two triangles?
AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) Congruence Theorem
If two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent respectively to the two angles and the non-included side of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
In Figure 1, given that ∆DOG ≅ ∆CAT, ∠D ≅ ∠C, ∠G ≅ ∠T as marked, while DO ≅ CA tells the congruence of the non-included sides. The proof of this theorem is presented in Example 3.
[illustration: triangles DOG and CAT with tick marks and angle arcs; labels D, O, G, C, A, T]
Figure 1
Another theorem that can be deduced from the congruence postulates are the congruence of right triangles. Below are the illustrations and descriptions of each theorem.
HyA (Hypotenuse-Acute angle) Congruence Theorem
If the hypotenuse and an acute angle of one right triangle are congruent to the corresponding hypotenuse and an acute angle of another right triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
This theorem can be applied to right triangles only. Figure 2 at the right shows two right triangles ∆RGA and ∆MSA. The hypotenuses AR and AM are congruent as marked, ∠RGA and ∠MSA are congruent because they are right angles, ∠GAR and ∠SAM are acute angles and ∠GAR ≅ ∠SAM because they are vertical angles. Using these congruent parts, the two triangles are congruent by HyA Congruence Theorem. The proof of this theorem is shown in Example 4.
[illustration: right triangles RGA and MSA sharing vertex A, with tick marks on hypotenuses AR and AM and right-angle marks at G and S; labels R, G, A, S, M]
Figure 2
HyL (Hypotenuse-leg) Congruence Theorem
If the hypotenuse and a leg of one right triangle are congruent to the corresponding hypotenuse and a leg of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Again, this theorem can be applied to right triangles only. As shown in Figure 3 at the right, ∆USB ≅ ∆ARC. US and AR are legs, and UB and AC are the hypotenuses of the given triangles, US ≅ AR and UB ≅ AC as marked, while ∠S ≅ ∠R, because both are right angles. The two right triangles are congruent by HyL Congruence Theorem. The proof of this is found in Example 5.
[illustration: right triangles USB and ARC with tick marks; labels U, S, B, A, R, C]
Figure 3
LA (leg-acute angle) Congruence Theorem
If a leg and an acute angle of one right triangle are congruent to a leg and an acute angle of another right triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
In the two right triangles in Figure 4, GU and RA are the congruent legs as marked, and ∠M and ∠P are congruent acute angles as marked, and ∠G ≅ ∠R because both are right angles. Hence, GU and ∠M are congruent respectively to RA and ∠P. The two right triangles are congruent by LA Congruence Theorem. The proof of this theorem is shown in Example 6.
[illustration: right triangles UGM and ARP with congruent legs marked and acute angles M and P marked; labels U, G, M, A, R, P]
Figure 4
LL (Leg Leg) Congruence Theorem
If the legs of one right triangle are congruent to the legs of another right triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
In the right triangles in Figure 5 at the right, AB and OC are the longer legs while BG and CP are the shorter legs of the two triangles. AB ≅ OC and BG ≅ CP as marked. Hence, we can conclude that the two legs of ∆BAG are congruent to the two legs of ∆COP so, ∆BAG ≅ ∆COP by LL Congruence Theorem. The proof of this theorem is shown in Example 7.
[illustration: right triangles BAG and COP with tick marks on legs AB and OC, and BG and CP; labels A, B, G, O, C, P]
Figure 5
How do we prove that two triangles are congruent? How do we prove the different triangle congruence theorems? Here are the steps in proving that two triangles are congruent.
Steps in Proving Congruence of Two Triangles
Step 1. Identify what the given are, and what is to be proved. Mark the given information on the diagram.
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Now, let us apply the congruence postulates and theorems in proving congruent triangles using the illustrative examples below.
Example 1
Prove that ∆RAW ≅ ∆RSD in Figure 6 at the right.
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved.
Given: AR ≅ SR, WR ≅ DR Prove: ∆RAW ≅ ∆RSD
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
∠WRA and ∠DRS are vertical angles so they are congruent by Vertical Angle Theorem, hence SAS congruence postulate can be used to prove ∆RAW ≅ ∆RSD.
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Two-column proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). AR ≅ SR, WR ≅ DR | 1). Given |
| 2). ∠WRA and ∠DRS are vertical angles | 2). Definition of vertical angles |
| 3). ∠WRA ≅ ∠DRS | 3). Vertical Angle Theorem |
| 4). ∆RAW ≅ ∆RSD | 4). SAS Congruence Postulate |
We were able to show the congruence of the two triangles using SAS congruence postulate.
[illustration: triangle RAW and triangle RSD intersecting at R, with tick marks; labels A, W, R, D, S]
Figure 6
Example 2
Based on Figure 7 at the right, prove that ∆REC ≅ ∆CAR.
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved.
Given: RE ≅ CA, EC ≅ AR Prove: ∆REC ≅ ∆CAR
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
CR is the common side of ∆REC and ∆CAR, so by reflexive property. Hence, SSS postulate can be used to prove ∆REC ≅ ∆CAR because each of the three sides of ∆REC is congruent respectively to the three sides of ∆CAR.
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Two-column proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). RE ≅ CA, EC ≅ AR | 1). Given |
| 2). CR ≅ CR | 2). Reflexive Property |
| 3). ∆REC ≅ ∆CAR | 3). SSS Congruence Postulate |
[illustration: parallelogram with vertices C, A, R, E and diagonal CR, with tick marks; labels C, A, E, R]
Figure 7
Example 3
In the Figure 8 at the right, prove that ∆DOG ≅ ∆CAT
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved
Given: DO ≅ CA, ∠D ≅ ∠C, ∠G ≅ ∠T Prove: ∆DOG ≅ ∆CAT
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
Since it is given that ∠D ≅ ∠C, ∠G ≅ ∠T, then by Angle Sum Theorem, ∠O ≅ ∠A.
Angle Sum Theorem states that the sum of the measures of the angles of a triangle is 180°. Because the two corresponding pairs of angles are already congruent, so the third pair of angles are also congruent.
Thus, the two triangles can be proven either by ASA congruence postulate or by AAS congruence theorem.
[illustration: triangles DOG and CAT with tick marks and angle arcs; labels D, O, G, C, A, T]
Figure 8
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Two-column proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). $\overline{DO} \cong \overline{CA}$ , $\angle D \cong \angle C$ , $\angle G \cong \angle T$ | 1). Given |
| 2). $\Delta DOG \cong \Delta CAT$ | 2). AAS Congruence Theorem |
or
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). $\overline{DO} \cong \overline{CA}$ , $\angle D \cong \angle C$ , $\angle G \cong \angle T$ | 1). Given |
| 2). $m\angle D = m\angle C$; $m\angle G = m\angle T$ | 2). Definition of Congruent Angles |
| 3). $m\angle D + m\angle O + m\angle G = 180^o$ $m\angle C + m\angle A + m\angle T = 180^o$ | 3). Angle Sum Theorem In a triangle |
| 4a). $m\angle O = 180^o – m\angle D – m\angle G$ 4b). $m\angle A = 180^o – m\angle C – m\angle T$ | 4). Addition Property of Equality |
| 5). $m\angle A = 180^o – m\angle D – m\angle G$ | 5). Substitution Property (2) |
| 6). $m\angle O = m\angle A$ | 6). Transitive Property of Equality (4a & 5) |
| 7). $\angle O \cong \angle A$ | 7). Converse of the Definition of Congruent Angles |
| 8). $\Delta DOG \cong \Delta CAT$ | 8). ASA Congruence Postulate |
You have noticed that in this example, we were able to prove the congruence of the given triangles by ASA postulate and at the same time by AAS theorem.
Let us try to use AAS congruence theorem in proving triangle congruence in the next example.
Example 4.
In the right triangles in Figure 9 at the right, prove that $\Delta ARG \cong \Delta AMS$.
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved.
Given: $\overline{RA} \cong \overline{MA}$, $\angle G$ and $\angle S$ are right angles
Prove: $\Delta ARG \cong \Delta AMS$
[illustration: Figure 9, two right triangles sharing vertex A, with points R, G, A, S, M labeled; tick marks on RA and AM]
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
Since $\overline{RM}$ intersects $\overline{GS}$, vertical angles are formed, and vertical angles are congruent. Thus, AAS congruence theorem can be used to prove $\Delta ARG \cong \Delta AMS$.
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Two-column proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). $\overline{RA} \cong \overline{MA}$ | 1). Given |
| 2). $\angle G$ and $\angle S$ are right angles | 2). Given |
| 3). $\angle G \cong \angle S$ | 3). Right Angle Theorem |
| 4). $\angle RAG$ and $\angle MAS$ are vertical angles | 4). Definition of Vertical Angles |
| 5). $\angle RAG \cong \angle MAS$ | 5). Vertical Angles Theorem |
| 6). $\Delta ARG \cong \Delta AMS$ | 6). AAS Congruence Theorem |
Hence, the two triangles are congruent by AAS theorem.
Example 5.
Figure 10 at the right shows that the hypotenuses and legs of the two right triangles are given to be congruent respectively. Prove that $\Delta BUS \cong \Delta CAR$.
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved
Given: $\overline{US} \cong \overline{AR}$, $\overline{BU} \cong \overline{CA}$, $\angle S$ and $\angle R$ are right angles
Prove: $\Delta BUS \cong \Delta CAR$
[illustration: Figure 10, two right triangles, BUS and CAR, with points U, S, B, A, R, C labeled; tick marks on the hypotenuses and legs]
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
The congruence of the $\Delta BUS$ and $\Delta CAR$ can be proven using SSS congruence postulate and HyL congruence theorem.
Case 1): In using the SSS congruence postulate, there is a need to show the congruence of $\overline{SB}$ and $\overline{RC}$ using the Pythagorean equation since the given triangles are right triangles.
Case 2); $\Delta BUS \cong \Delta CAR$ can also be proven using the HyL congruence theorem because the given triangles are right triangles.
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Two-column proof:
Case 1:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). $\overline{US} \cong \overline{AR}$ , $\overline{BU} \cong \overline{CA}$ | 1). Given |
| 2). $|US| = |AR|$, $|BU| = |CA|$ | 2) Definition of congruent segments |
| 3) $\angle S$ and $\angle R$ are right angles. | 3). Given |
| 4). $\Delta BUS$ and $\Delta CAR$ are right triangles. | 4). Definition of right triangle. |
| 5a). $|BU|^2 = |US|^2 + |SB|^2$ 5b). $|CA|^2 = |AR|^2 + |RC|^2$ | 5). Pythagorean Theorem |
| 6a). $|BU|^2 – |US|^2 = |SB|^2$ 6b). $|CA|^2 – |AR|^2 = |RC|^2$ | 6). Addition Property of Equality |
[transcriber’s note: table continued from the previous page]
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 7). $|BU|^2 – |US|^2 = |RC|^2$ | 7). Substitution Property (2) |
| 8a). $|SB| = \sqrt{|BU|^2 – |US|^2}$ 8b). $|RC| = \sqrt{|BU|^2 – |US|^2}$ | 8). Raising Each Side to a Power Property |
| 9). $|SB| = |RC|$ | 9). Transitive Property |
| 10). $\overline{SB} \cong \overline{RC}$ | 10). Converse of the Definition of Congruent segments |
| 11). $\Delta BUS \cong \Delta CAR$ | 11). SSS Congruence Postulate |
Case 2:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). $\overline{US} \cong \overline{AR}$ , $\overline{BU} \cong \overline{CA}$ | 1). Given |
| 2) $\angle S$ and $\angle R$ are right angles. | 2). Given |
| 3). $\angle S \cong \angle R$ | 3). Right Angle Theorem |
| 4). $\Delta BUS$ and $\Delta CAR$ are right triangles. | 4). Definition of right triangle. |
| 5). $\overline{US}$ and $\overline{AR}$ are legs of the right triangles | 5). Definition of leg of a right triangle. (A side of a right triangle opposite an acute angle is called leg.) |
| 6). $\overline{BU}$ and $\overline{CA}$ are the hypotenuses of the right triangles. | 6). Definition of hypotenuse. |
| 7). $\Delta BUS \cong \Delta CAR$ | 7). ) HyL Congruence Theorem |
Example 6.
In Figure 11 at the right, corresponding congruent parts of the right triangles are similarly marked. Prove that $\Delta GUM \cong \Delta RAP$.
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved,
Given: $\overline{GU} \cong \overline{RA}$ , $\angle M \cong \angle P$ , $\angle G$ and $\angle R$ are right angles
Prove: $\Delta GUM \cong \Delta RAP$
[illustration: Figure 11, two right triangles, GUM and RAP, with points U, G, M, A, R, P labeled; tick marks and angle marks as printed]
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
By the Right-Angle theorem, $\angle G \cong \angle R$, plus the given above, we can prove that $\Delta GUM \cong \Delta RAP$ by AAS congruent theorem. And since the given triangles are right triangles, $\Delta GUM \cong \Delta RAP$ can be proven by LA congruence theorem.
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Two-column proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). $\overline{GU} \cong \overline{RA}$ , $\angle M \cong \angle P$ | 1). Given |
| 2). $\angle G$ and $\angle R$ are right angles | 2). Given |
| 3). $\angle G \cong \angle R$ | 3). Right Angle Theorem |
| 4). $\overline{GU}$ and $\overline{RA}$ are legs of the right triangles. | 4). Definition of leg of a right triangle Leg is a side of a right triangle opposite an acute angle. |
| 5). $\angle M$ and $\angle P$ are acute angles in the right triangles | 5). Acute angle in a right triangle is opposite to a leg. |
| 6). $\Delta GUM \cong \Delta RAP$ | 6). AAS Congruence Theorem |
| 7). $\Delta GUM \cong \Delta RAP$ | 7) LA Congruence Theorem |
Example 7.
The two legs of $\Delta BAG$ are congruent respectively to the two legs of $\Delta COP$. The two triangles are right. Prove that $\Delta BAG \cong \Delta COP$
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved
Given: $\overline{BA} \cong \overline{CO}$ , $\overline{BG} \cong \overline{CP}$, $\Delta ABG$ and $\Delta OCP$ are right triangles
Prove: $\Delta BAG \cong \Delta COP$
[illustration: two right triangles, ABG and OCP, with points A, B, G, O, C, P labeled; tick marks on the legs]
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
Since the two triangles, $\Delta ABG$ and $\Delta OCP$ are right, hence $\angle B \cong \angle C$. Based on the given congruent parts, $\Delta BAG \cong \Delta COP$ by SAS congruence postulate.
The congruence of the corresponding legs of the two triangles will lead us to show that $\overline{AG} \cong \overline{OP}$ through the use of Pythagorean Theorem. So, $\Delta BAG \cong \Delta COP$ can also be proven using SSS Congruence Postulate.
And since the corresponding legs of the right triangles are congruent, it can also be proven by LL congruence theorem, as shown in step 3 below
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Two-column proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). $\overline{BA} \cong \overline{CO}$ , $\overline{BG} \cong \overline{CP}$ | 1). Given |
| 2). $\Delta ABG$ and $\Delta OCP$ are right triangles | 2). Given |
| 3). $\angle B$ and $\angle C$ are right angles | 3). Given in the figure. Definition of right triangle. |
| 4). $\angle B \cong \angle C$ | 4). Right-Angle Theorem |
[transcriber’s note: table continued from the previous page]
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 5). $\overline{BA}$ and $\overline{CO}$, $\overline{BG}$ and $\overline{CP}$ are pairs of corresponding legs of the right triangles | 5). Legs are sides of a right triangle opposite the acute angles. |
| 6). $\Delta BAG \cong \Delta COP$ | 6). LL Congruence Theorem |
Now let us try to explore examples of triangle congruence in the real-world and prove that these triangles are congruent.
Example 8.
Shapes formed by the ribs, stretchers, and shaft are congruent whether an umbrella is open or closed. Prove that the triangles formed by the shaft and the ribs are congruent.
[illustration: umbrella frame with labeled parts rib, Stretcher, Shaft; points A, R, I, N and numbers 1 to 6 marked]
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved
Given: Quadrilateral RAIN is a parallelogram, and $\overline{AN}$ is a diagonal.
Prove: $\Delta ARN \cong \Delta NIA$
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
The congruence between $\Delta ARN$ and $\Delta NIA$ can be proven by SSS, ASA, and SAS congruence postulates.
Step 3. Write down the statements and the reasons in a two-column proof. Make sure the last statement contains what should be proved.
Proof: Case 1:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). Quadrilateral RAIN is a parallelogram. | 1). Given |
| 2). $\overline{AN}$ is a diagonal. | 2). Given |
| 3). $\overline{AR} \cong \overline{NI}$ and $\overline{RN} \cong \overline{IA}$ | Opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent. |
| 4). $\overline{AN} \cong \overline{AN}$ | 4). Reflexive Property |
| 5). $\Delta ARN \cong \Delta NIA$ | 5). SSS Congruence Postulate |
Proof: Case 2:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). Quadrilateral RAIN is a parallelogram. | 1). Given |
| 2). $\overline{AN}$ is a diagonal. | 2). Given |
| 3). $\angle R \cong \angle I$ | Opposite angles of a parallelogram are congruent. |
| 4). $\overline{AR} \cong \overline{NI}$ and $\overline{RN} \cong \overline{IA}$ | Opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent. |
| 5). $\Delta ARN \cong \Delta NIA$ | 5). SAS Congruence Postulate |
Proof: Case 3:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1). Quadrilateral RAIN is a parallelogram. | 1). Given |
| 2). $\overline{AN}$ is a diagonal. | 2). Given |
| 3). $\overline{AR} \parallel \overline{NI}$ and $\overline{RN} \parallel \overline{IA}$ | Opposite sides of a parallelogram are parallel. |
| 3). $\angle 1 \cong \angle 4$ and $\angle 2 \cong \angle 3$ | Alternate interior angles are congruent if parallel lines are cut by a transversal |
| 4). $\overline{AN} \cong \overline{AN}$ | 4). Reflexive Property |
| 5). $\Delta ARN \cong \Delta NIA$ | 5). ASA Congruence Postulate |
Example 9.
Determine if triangles are congruent. Consider the figure at the right. The diagonals of the tower form triangles. Consider $\Delta AEC$ and $\Delta FED$ as illustrated.
Step 1. Identify what the given are and what is to be proved.
Given: Quadrilateral ADFC is an isosceles trapezoid, and $\angle EAC \cong \angle EFD$.
Prove: $\Delta AEC \cong \Delta FED$
[illustration: tower with diagonal lattice; trapezoid ADFC with point E; segments AC and DF in bold]
Step 2. Identify the congruence theorem to be used and the additional information needed and why.
[transcriber’s note: this table has no printed header row; the header is added for layout, and the rows continue from Step 2 above]
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| $\angle EAC \cong \angle EFD$ | given congruent angles |
| $\angle ECA \cong \angle EDF$ | congruent because Alternate Interior Angles |
| $\angle AEC \cong \angle FED$ | congruent by Vertical Angle Theorem |
| $\overline{AC}$ and $\overline{DF}$ are not congruent | Parallel sides of a trapezoid are not congruent. |
| $\overline{AE}$ and $\overline{EF}$ are not congruent $\overline{CE}$ and $\overline{ED}$ are not congruent | Diagonals of an isosceles trapezoid do not bisect each other. |
| $\Delta AEC$ and $\Delta DEF$ are not congruent. | Notice that the three pairs corresponding angles of the two triangles are congruent. However, this fact will not be sufficient to prove triangle congruence |
The Angle-Angle-Angle (AAA) combination shows that the two triangles may have the same shape but different sizes. In the figure, $\Delta AEC$ and $\Delta FED$ have corresponding angles congruent but their sizes are not the same, hence their corresponding sides are not congruent. Therefore, $\Delta AEC$ and $\Delta FED$ are not congruent.
What’s More
Activity 1: Give Me!
I. Using the given congruent parts, state the postulate or theorem that proves $\Delta JAS \cong \Delta MIN$
- $\overline{JS} \cong \overline{MN}$, $\angle J \cong \angle M$, $\overline{JA} \cong \overline{MI}$
- $\angle S \cong \angle N$, $\angle A \cong \angle I$, $\overline{SA} \cong \overline{NI}$
- $\angle J \cong \angle M$, $\angle A \cong \angle I$, $\overline{SA} \cong \overline{NI}$
[illustration: two triangles, JAS and MIN, with vertices J, A, S, M, I, N labeled]
II. Give additional congruent parts needed to prove that $\Delta CAR \cong \Delta TOY$ by the indicated postulate.
- $\overline{AR} \cong \overline{OY}$, $\angle R \cong \angle Y$ ; SAS
- $\angle C \cong \angle T$, $\overline{AC} \cong \overline{OT}$ ; ASA
- $\overline{TO} \cong \overline{CA}$, $\overline{TY} \cong \overline{CR}$ ; SSS
III.
In each figure, congruent parts are marked. Give additional parts to prove that the triangles are congruent and name the postulate or theorem that justifies the congruence.
- [illustration: parallelogram with vertices A, R, T, P; tick marks on sides and angles as printed]
- [illustration: parallelogram with vertices R, S, H, T; angle marks at R and T]
- [illustration: two triangles, S, T, D, F and point A at the intersection; tick marks as printed]
- [illustration: rectangle with vertices O, N, A, G; diagonal OG; right-angle marks at A and N; tick marks as printed]
Questions:
- How did you identify the postulate or theorem in part I?
- How did you identify the additional part to prove that the two triangles are congruent in Part II?
- Were you able to give an additional congruent part in Part III to prove that the two triangles are congruent? If yes, how?
Activity 2: Fill Me Up
Given: R is the midpoint of $\overline{AU}$
$\angle A$ and $\angle U$ are right angles
Prove: $\Delta BAR \cong \Delta FUR$
[illustration: triangles BAR and FUR sharing point R on segment AU; B above A, F below U; right-angle marks at A and U; tick marks on AR and RU; angle marks at R]
Proof: (Complete the table)
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. R is the midpoint of $\overline{AU}$ | 1. |
| 2. | 2. Definition of Midpoint |
| 3. | 3. Given |
| 4. $\angle A \cong \angle U$ | 4. |
| 5. $\angle BRA$ and $\angle FRU$ are vertical angles | 5. Definition of Vertical Angles |
| 6. | 6. Vertical Angle Theorem |
| 7. $\Delta BAR \cong \Delta FUR$ | 7. |
Questions: 1). What are the identified congruent corresponding parts? 2). What congruence postulate and congruence theorem can be used to prove that $\triangle BAR \cong \triangle FUR$ ?
Activity 3. My Home
Trusses in our houses form congruent triangles similar to the picture at the right.
Given: $\overline{HO} \cong \overline{MO}$ , $\overline{HE} \cong \overline{ME}$
Prove: $\triangle HOE \cong \triangle MOE$
[illustration: triangular roof truss with top vertex O, base vertices H (left), E (middle), and M (right); vertical and diagonal members drawn inside]
Proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. $\overline{HO} \cong \overline{MO}$ , $\overline{HE} \cong \overline{ME}$ | 1. |
| 2. | 2. Reflexive Property |
| 3. $\triangle HOE \cong \triangle MOE$ | 3. |
Questions:
- How do you find the activity? Did you find it difficult to prove the congruence of two triangles?
- Why do you think the trusses in our houses form congruent triangles?
- List down at least five things in your house, buildings or other structures found in your community where congruent triangles are used. Explain the importance of congruent triangles in these structures.
What I Have Learned
PROVING CONGRUENT TRIANGLES
Name and describe the triangle congruence postulates and theorems by filling up the blanks with the correct answer
Fill each blank with correct answer.
Two triangles are congruent if and only if their _____________ can be made to coincide such that corresponding _____________ are congruent and corresponding _____________ are congruent.
Instead of showing the six corresponding congruent parts, the congruence postulates and theorems reduce these into three. The Congruence Postulates are _____________ , _____________ , and _____________ .
The Congruence Theorems are _____________ , _____________ , _____________ , _____________ , and _____________ . The AAS Congruence Triangle Theorem is deduced from _____________ Congruence Postulate. _____________ and _____________ are theorems which can be proved using the AAS Congruence Theorems while _____________ and _____________ are theorems which can be proved using the SSS Postulates.
Illustrate the three triangle congruence postulates
[transcriber’s note: the answer box for this item is empty]
Answer this!
Why do congruent triangles appear in many structures such as buildings and towers?
What I Can Do
The Buntun bridge spans the Cagayan River. It is 1,369 m long and said to be the longest river bridge in the country. It was opened in 1947 and has been known as the gateway to the City of Tuguegarao. The bridge has never been flooded by the river but it almost did when typhoons Ondoy and Juan hit the city. One of the reasons why it still stands magnificently until today because of its structures that are made of congruent triangles.
In the figure at the right, it is given that $\overline{ED} \cong \overline{RB}$ and $\overline{ED} \parallel \overline{RB}$ .
Prove that $\triangle RED \cong \triangle DBR$ by completing the two-column proof below.
[photo: Buntun Bridge over a river, with labels E, R, D, and B on the truss]
Buntun Bridge
Proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. $\overline{ED} \cong \overline{RB}$ $\overline{ED} \parallel \overline{RB}$ | 1. |
| 2. $\angle BRD$ & $\angle EDR$ are alternate interior angles | 2. |
| 3. $\angle BRD \cong \angle EDR$ | 3. |
| 4. $\overline{RD} \cong \overline{RD}$ | 4. |
| 5. $\triangle RED \cong \triangle DBR$ | 5. |
Assessment
Directions: Choose the letter of the best answer. Write the chosen letter on a separate sheet of paper.
Which of the theorems below states that: “If two angles and a non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and a non-included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.”?
- A. HyA Congruence Theorem
- B. HyL Congruence Theorem
- C. LL Congruence Theorem
- D. AAS Congruence Theorem
Which of the following theorems states that: “If the hypotenuse and an acute angle of one right triangle are congruent to the corresponding hypotenuse and an acute angle of another right triangle, then the triangles are congruent.”?
- A. HyA Congruence Theorem
- B. HyL Congruence Theorem
- C. LA Congruence Theorem
- D. LL Congruence Theorem
Which of the following pairs of triangles below are congruent and can be proved by SAS Congruence?
[illustration: three pairs of triangles labeled i, ii, and iii; pair i has marked sides and angles with vertices A, B, C and X, Y, Z; pair ii has vertices A, B, C and D, E, F with a right-angle mark; pair iii has vertices A, B, C and X, Y, Z with right-angle marks]
- A. i and ii
- B. ii and iii
- C. iii
- D. i, ii, and iii
- In the figure at the right, $\overline{OT}$ is a perpendicular bisector of $\overline{HS}$ at T. What triangle congruence theorem can be used to prove that $\triangle HOT \cong \triangle SOT$?
[illustration: triangular truss with top vertex O and base vertices H, T, and S; vertical and diagonal members inside]
- A. LL Congruence Theorem
- B. HyA Congruence Theorem
- C. HyL Congruence Theorem
- D. AAS Congruence Theorem
- In the figures at the right, $\angle E \cong \angle A$, $\overline{ET} \cong \overline{AY}$. What additional data is needed to prove that $\triangle NET \cong \triangle PAY$ by SAS Congruence?
[illustration: two triangles; the upper triangle has vertices N, E, and T with vertex P on its side; the lower triangle has vertices P, A, and Y; congruence marks shown on angles E and A and on sides ET and AY]
- A. $\angle N \cong \angle P$
- B. $\angle T \cong \angle Y$
- C. $\overline{NE} \cong \overline{PA}$
- D. $\overline{NT} \cong \overline{PY}$
- Which statement is NOT sufficient to prove the congruence of two triangles?
- A. Two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent respectively to the two angles and the included side of another triangle.
- B. Two sides of one triangle are congruent respectively to the two sides of another triangle
- C. Two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent respectively to the two angles and the non-included side of another triangle.
- D. Three sides of one triangle are congruent respectively to the three sides of another triangle.
For items 7 to 9, complete the table below. Choose the letter of the correct answer from the choices provided.
- A. $\angle CUE$ and $\angle TUE$ are right angles
- B. Given
- C. $\overline{EU} \cong \overline{EU}$
- D. SAS Congruence Postulate
- E. Right Angle Theorem
Given: $\overline{EU}$ is the ⊥ bisector of $\overline{CT}$ Prove: $\triangle CUE \cong \triangle TUE$
[illustration: Figure No. 1, a triangle with apex E and base points C, U, and T, with U between C and T and EU drawn perpendicular to CT]
Proof:
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. $\overline{EU}$ is the ⊥ bisector of $\overline{CT}$ | (7) |
| 2. $\angle CUE$ and $\angle TUE$ are right angles | Definition of Perpendicular Line Segments |
| 3. $\angle CUE \cong \angle TUE$ | Right Angle Theorem |
| 4. $\overline{CU} \cong \overline{UT}$ | Definition of ⊥ bisector |
| 5. (8) | Reflexive Property |
| 6. $\triangle CUE \cong \triangle TUE$ | (9) |
For items 10 to 12, use figure no. 1 and its given data to complete the table below by choosing the letter of the correct answer below.
Given: $\overline{EU}$ is the ⊥ bisector of $\overline{CT}$ Prove: $\triangle CUE \cong \triangle TUE$
[illustration: Figure No. 1, a triangle with apex E and base points C, U, and T, with U between C and T and EU drawn perpendicular to CT]
- A. LA Congruence Theorem
- B. Definition of perpendicular bisector
- C. LL Congruence Theorem
- D. HyL Congruence Theorem
- E. HyA Congruence Theorem
- F. $\triangle CUE \cong \triangle TUE$
- G. $\overline{CU} \cong \overline{UT}$
- H. $\overline{CU} \cong \overline{EU}$
- I. $\overline{EU} \cong \overline{EU}$
- J. $\angle C \cong \angle T$
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. $\overline{EU}$ is the ⊥ bisector of $\overline{CT}$ | 1. Given |
| 2. U is the midpoint of $\overline{CT}$ | 2. (10) |
| 3. (11) | 3. Definition of Midpoint |
| 4. $\angle CUE$ and $\angle TUE$ are right angles | 4. Definition of perpendicular bisector |
| 5. $\angle CUE \cong \angle TUE$ | 5. Right Angle Theorem |
| 6. $\overline{EU} \cong \overline{EU}$ | 6. Reflexive Property |
| 7. $\triangle CUE \cong \triangle TUE$ | 7. (12) |
You are tasked to make a design of the flooring of your barangay hall using triangles. The available materials are square tiles. How are you going to make the design?
- A. Apply triangle congruence by SSS
- B. Apply triangle congruence by SAS.
- F. Apply triangle congruence by ASA.
- G. Apply triangle congruence by AAS.
The figure at the right shows a ring with a rhombus-shaped diamond. $\overline{IG}$ divides the diamond into two congruent triangles. What reason will justify that $\angle IRG \cong \angle ING$?
[photo: ring with a rhombus-shaped diamond; vertices labeled I (top), R (left), G (bottom), and N (right)]
- A. Adjacent angles congruent
- B. Vertical angles are congruent
- C. Alternate interior angle congruent
- D. Opposite angles of a rhombus are congruent
- Using the same figure in no. 14, what triangle congruence postulate/theorem may NOT be used to prove that $\triangle RIG \cong \triangle NIG$?
- A. SSS
- B. SAS
- C. SAA
- D. H
Additional Activities
During a storm, a man supported his hut by using three wires of equal length. The wires are staked to the ground at different points $R, S, T$ which are of the same distance from the base of the hut. Explain and illustrate how you can prove that the angles formed by the wires attached to the ground are all congruent.
Your output will be rated using the following rubrics
| 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Able to provide correct, logical, explanation and illustration of the hut completely and clearly | Able to provide an explanation and illustration of the hut but not complete and clear | Able to provide explanation and illustration of the hut but the hut being illustrated is not strong enough to survive the storm. | Able to provide a brief explanation without illustration. | Was not able to provide an explanation and illustration. |
Answer Key
What I Know
- B
- A
- C
- B
- B
- C
- C
- B
- D
- A
- A
- A
- B
- E
- B
What’s In
- C
- B
- A
- C
- B
What’s New
| 1. $\overline{AR} \cong \overline{SR}$ | $\overline{WR} \cong \overline{DR}$ | $\angle ARW \cong \angle SRD$ |
| 2. $\overline{CE} \cong \overline{RA}$ | $\overline{ER} \cong \overline{AC}$ | $\overline{CR} \cong \overline{CR}$ |
[transcriber’s note: the layout of this table is uncertain because the page is printed upside down; the cell placement above is a best reading]
What’s More
Activity 1
I.
- SAS Congruence Postulate
- ASA Congruence Postulate
- AAS Congruence Theorem
II.
- $\overline{TY} \cong \overline{CR}$
- $\angle O \cong \angle A$
- $\overline{AR} \cong \overline{OY}$
III.
- $\overline{AT} \cong \overline{AT}$ [?] ; SSS Congruence
- $\overline{RT} \cong \overline{RT}$ ; ASA Congruence
- $\angle FAT \cong \angle SAD$ ; SAS Congruence
- $\overline{OG} \cong \overline{OG}$ ; HyL Congruence
Activity 2
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. | Given |
| 2. $\overline{AR} \cong \overline{RU}$ | 2. |
| 3. $\angle A$ and $\angle U$ are right angles | 3. |
| 4. $\angle A \cong \angle U$ | Right Angle Theorem |
| 5. $\angle FRU \cong \angle BRA$ | 5. |
| 6. | 6. |
| 7. | ASA Congruence Postulate |
[transcriber’s note: several cells of this table are unclear in the upside-down printing; the cell placement above is a best reading]
Activity 3
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. | Given |
| 2. $\overline{OE} \cong \overline{OE}$ | 2. |
| 3. | SSS Congruence Postulate |
What I Have Learned
Two triangles are congruent if and only if their vertices can be paired such that corresponding sides are congruent and corresponding angles congruent.
Instead of showing the six corresponding congruent parts, the congruence postulates and theorems reduce these into three. The Congruence Postulates are SSS, SAS, and ASA. The Congruence Theorems are AAS, LA, LL, HyL, and HyA. The AAS Triangle Theorem is deduced from ASA Congruence Postulate. LA and HyA are theorems which can be proved using the AAS Congruence Theorems while LL and HyL are theorems which are proved using the SSS Postulates.
What I Can Do
| Statements | Reasons |
|---|---|
| 1. $\overline{ED} \cong \overline{RB}$ ; $\overline{ED} \parallel \overline{RB}$ | Given |
| 2. $\angle BRD$ & $\angle EDR$ are alternate interior angles | Definition of alternate interior angles |
| 3. $\angle EDR \cong \angle BRD$ | When parallel lines are cut by a transversal, alternate interior angles are congruent |
| 4. $\overline{RD} \cong \overline{RD}$ | Reflexive property |
| 5. $\triangle RED \cong \triangle DBR$ | SAS Congruence |
Assessment
- D
- A
- D
- A
- C
- B
- B
- C
- D
- B
- G
- C
- A
- D
- D
Additional Activities
(Students’ answers vary.)
References
A. Book
- Emmanuel Abunzo, et. al., Mathematics 8 Learner’s Module (Pasig City, Philippines: Book Media Press, Inc. and Prinwell, Inc., 2013).
- A Baccay, Geometry for Secondary Schools (Philippines: Phoenix Publishing House), 140-190.
- Ricardo Crisostomo, Priscila de Sagun, and Alicia Padua, Our World of Math (Quezon City, Philippines: Vibal Publishing House, Inc., 2013).
- Soledad Dilao and Julieta Bernabe, Geometry (Quezon City, Philippines: SD Publication, Inc., 2010).
- Robert Kalin and Mary Kay Corbitt, Geometry, Prentice Hall (Jurong, Singapore: Pearson Education, Inc., 1993).
- Karl Romero and Freidrich Jose, Geometry in the Real World: Explorations and Applications (Makati City, Philippines: Salesiana Publishers, Inc., 2003).
B. Electronic Resources
- www.mathbitnotebook.com/Geometry/BasicTerms/BTauxiliary.html
- Regional Training for Teachers on Critical Content in Mathematics 8, 2018.
- https://www.google.com/search?q=free+downloadable+rhombus+shape+ring&tbm=isch&hl=en&chips=q:free+downloadable+rhombus+shape+ring,online_chips:diamond&hl=en&ved=2ahUKEwiuiKerjePqAhVPA6YKHW0YBsUQ4lYoAHoECAEQFg&biw=1349&bih=608#imgrc=pVlCtS2FzkwFJM
For inquiries or feedback, please write or call:
Department of Education – Bureau of Learning Resources (DepEd-BLR)
Ground Floor, Bonifacio Bldg., DepEd Complex Meralco Avenue, Pasig City, Philippines 1600
Telefax: (632) 8634-1072; 8634-1054; 8631-4985
Email Address: blr.lrqad@deped.gov.ph * blr.lrpd@deped.gov.ph

Leave a Reply